[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#5456) inaccurate interpretation of LDIF in back perl
Please do not email me directly unless you are a paying client of my company.
This thread started on the ITS. It should remain on the ITS.
I already explained to you what the RFC spec says about valid LDIF. Valid LDIF
does not start with an empty line. There is nothing further to explain.
Uwe Werler wrote:
> Dear Howard,
>
> after some testing again I determined that back_perl doesn't accept
> ldif_entries which are starting with an empty line. Then slapd tells me
> "str2entry: entry -1 has no dn".
>
> Is this behavior correct? If so it will be good to explain in the man
> page or the example that an entry should start with a dn line and
> shouldn't contain any empty lines nor the version information at the
> first line.
>
> I think that my mistake was to use sample code I've found like this:
>
> sub search
> {
>
> my $this = shift;
> my($base, $scope, $deref, $sizeLim, $timeLim, $filterStr, $attrOnly, @attrs ) = @_;
> if (! defined($this->{'LDAP'})) {
> $ldap = Net::LDAP->new( 'localhost' ) ;
> $this->{'LDAP'} = $ldap;
> }
> $mesg=$this->{'LDAP'}->search(base=>$base,
> scope=>$scope,
> deref=>$deref,
> sizelimit =>$sizeLim,
> timelimit =>$timeLim,
> filter =>$filterStr,
> attrs=> @attrs );
>
> my @list = ();
>
>
> foreach $entry ($mesg->all_entries) {
> my $data;
> $LDIF = new IO::Scalar \$data;
> $dump=Net::LDAP::LDIF->new($LDIF,"w");
> $dump->write($entry);
> $LDIF->close;
> push @list,$data;
> }
> return ( 0 , @list);
>
> }
>
> Because the entries returned by Net::LDAP::LDIF are starting with a leading SEP it won't work as is in back_perl.
>
> Thank You very much for Your attention.
>
> Regards Uwe
>
>
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/