[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#5171) hdb txn_checkpoint failures
> itself. Again, we can't really tell without single-stepping thru the BDB
> library code. It may not be worth the effort, but that's your call.
The lock was
env_region.c:290 MUTEX_LOCK(dbenv, &renv->mutex);
but that wasn't making much sense....and after a couple minutes in dbx I
realized that I've been killing myself with the attempts at db_stat.
Yesterday's attempts were running db_* binaries with a wrong (but
compatible) ABI. It'd be nice if Sleepycat had some more/earlier checks
for that, but oh well...
So anyway, I corrupted base2/slave4 by running the wrong db_stat, but that
left three other bases on slave4 and all three bases on slave6. I ran
db_stat -l on them, the output is:
https://www.nbcs.rutgers.edu/~richton/its5171_dbstatl
BTW, this ABI screwup shouldn't be the root cause of the failures...I
haven't tried any db tools until the course of debugging this. These are
AUTOREMOVE, so db_archive is unlikely, for instance.