Re: Issues with syncrepl and mirrormode

[Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> I've backed out RID, which is now decimal again (0..999), and let sctxcsn
> be NULL when no maxcsn can be gathered.  In this case, after running
> test050 and leaving the directories in place, if I restart the two servers
> and perform an add as the first operation, the server acting as a consumer
> crashes both in refreshOnly and in refreshAndPersist modes (I plan to
> modify the test in order to trigger this case, so we can track regressions
> once it's fixed).  My question is now:
> 
> 1) is it correct that syncprov_op_response() is set up at all for those
> modifications that come from the producer?

Obviously yes, to enable cascaded replication

> 2) If it is, should maxcsn be available?

don't know yet

> 3) If not, how should its absence be dealt with?

it should definitely be dealt with: cascaded replication incurs into
this issue; after adding cookie logging, testrun/slapd.4.log after
test019 is full of

syncprov_sendresp: cookie=rid=001,csn=

> 4) otherwise, if yes, why isn't it available?

dunno yet.

p.



Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office:  +39 02 23998309
Mobile:  +39 333 4963172
Email:   pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
---------------------------------------