[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
<quote who="Howard Chu">
> ghenry@suretecsystems.com wrote:
>
>> Depends on the time you have I suppose.
>>
>> I presume this isn't the case in 2.4?
>>
>> If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4?
>
> Referring people to 2.4 really isn't nice unless we have an actual release
> to
> refer them to. Which is another reason we need to get a 2.4 beta out ASAP.
True. Also, when I raised this ticket I wasn't part of the team, so I can
take on the man page fix if Hallvard doesn't have time.
> Since it looks like no activity has occurred on closing out the remaining
> devel
> ITSs perhaps we should just freeze the current tree and roll out 2.4.5
> as-is.
I think that would peak users interest again too.
> --
> -- Howard Chu
> Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
>