[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#4907) Syncrepl consumer failing to perform deletes
------=_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
On 4/2/07, Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:
>
> > I am attempting to set up syncrepl between two OpenLDAP 2.3.32servers. Adds
> > and Modifies are replicated from the provider to the consumer, but
> deletes
> > result in thousands of "unknown filter type 136644788" messages in the
> consumer
> > log and no deletion. Commenting out the syncprov-sessionlog directive
> works
> > around the issue.
>
> I don't see this with 2.3.32 on Linux 2.6.18. You'll probably need to
> trace the activity with gdb to see what's wrong with the filter.
Right you are. The patch for ITS#4638 (rejected here:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html) introduced
the bug. I'll send in a corrected patch once it has been QA'd.
--
Thanks,
Sean Burford
------=_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/2/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Howard Chu</b> <<a href="mailto:hyc@symas.com">hyc@symas.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> I am attempting to set up syncrepl between two OpenLDAP 2.3.32 servers. Adds<br>> and Modifies are replicated from the provider to the consumer, but deletes<br>> result in thousands of "unknown filter type 136644788" messages in the consumer
<br>> log and no deletion. Commenting out the syncprov-sessionlog directive works<br>> around the issue.<br><br>I don't see this with 2.3.32 on Linux 2.6.18. You'll probably need to<br>trace the activity with gdb to see what's wrong with the filter.
</blockquote><div><br>
Right you are. The patch for ITS#4638 (rejected here: <a href="http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html">http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html</a>) introduced the bug. I'll send in a corrected patch once it has been QA'd.
<br><br></div></div>-- <br>Thanks,<br>Sean Burford
------=_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921--