[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#4010)



Hite Lee wrote:
> I tested it. It is ok! And faster than before.
> Thanks for everyone!
>
> BTW, is there any idea to write a ldif file over >2G bytes? Of course, it is another problem. Is it a good idea to add some command arguments to specify the range of entry ID?
>
>   
Look up how to compile with largefile support on your platform. On Linux 
this usually requires compiling with
    -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DFILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
>> lihaitao@kingsoft.com wrote:
>>     
>>> Last mail is wrong, please see this.Thank you.
>>>
>>> My server has 4G RAM. And 2.8G has been userd when out of memory.
>>> The slapd.conf is below:
>>>   
>>>       
>> I have committed a fix for slapcat into CVS HEAD and the REL_ENG_2_2 
>> branch. You can simply pull back-bdb/cache.c -r1.38.2.20 onto your 
>> 2.2.28 source tree for testing purposes. Note that a similar problem 
>> remains for the running slapd, and that problem is not addressed by this 
>> patch. Most likely it will not be fully fixed until later in the 2.3 
>> release.
-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/