[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?

To: "Chris Markle" <cmarkle@sendmail.com>
Subject: Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:23:43 +0100 (CET)
Cc: openldap-bugs@OpenLDAP.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=sys-net.it; c=simple; q=dns; b=iHGHzKQbYKMHZDMezI5QgHZUIpaXAeooHCksGUS3VYd/mvMd+GIHiO38qFKQlf2O1 +vwAtmlgG4LxgivgGJjYA==
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <419E2BA5.5060305@sendmail.com>
References: <419E2BA5.5060305@sendmail.com>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1

Cris,

does the problem affect 2.2/HEAD as well?  There won't likely be any
further release of 2.1, but patches that fix problems in past releases can
be surely hosted and advertized; feel free to submit it thru the ITS.

Thanks, p.

> There's an issue in slapd's daemon.c where it can loop / spin after
> EBADF is returned from select() (don't know root cause but do know it
> can loop). What do I do with this information? Should we discuss here?
> You guys don't want ITS's opened anymore on 2.1.x I think... Chris
>


-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it


    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
  - From: Chris Markle <cmarkle@sendmail.com>

References:
- Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
  - From: Chris Markle <cmarkle@sendmail.com>

Prev by Date: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
Next by Date: Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread