Re: Syncrepl nits with operational attributes (ITS#3289)

[Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]

At 12:37 PM 8/19/2004, hyc@symas.com wrote:
>Maybe better would be for syncrepl to have a hardcoded list of 
>attributes that it ignores - e.g., all values that we know are 
>dynamically generated (like hasSubordinates) and all values that are 
>DSA-specific (e.g. subschemaSubentry), so that attrs=*,+ will work 
>without hassles. 

This is my preference.  The slave should be able to right
thing with everything (atrrs=*,+) as well as anything
(any subset of the above -- e.g., factional replication).