At 07:30 AM 6/2/2003, h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote: >Sorry, I don't know why I said back-tcl. back-tcl is fine. > >BTW, and another solution for back-shell would be to not >send the pid to the abandon process, though that probably >makes back-shell abandon pretty useless. Yes, I think the best solution is just to axe back-shell abandon. Kurt