[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: SLAPI (ITS#2073)
Ando,
I am actually using gcc 2.91.66 on redhat 6.2.
Thanks,
Steve Omrani
Senior Software Developer
Internet: somrani@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-838-8375 (TL 678-8375)
Fax: 512-838-8597
"Pierangelo
Masarati" To: Steve Omrani/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
<ando@sys-net.it> cc: <openldap-its@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: SLAPI (ITS#2073)
12/01/2002 02:27
PM
Please respond to
ando
> What kind of plugins are you trying to test? I have written several
> simple ones
> (cut and paste from manuls) for testing purpose (extended operation,
> preop bind, preop add, postop add, postop delete, ...) they are working
> fine.
Yes, a simple test from Netscape's docs, with a few changes
because it used some slapi_*() funcs not present in the patch.
> If there are any unresolved symbols in libslapi.so, then the server will
> not come
> up. However, the loader will tell you what symboles it can not resolve.
>
> The ref. manual for Netscape plugin is:
>
>
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/directory/dirPlugin40/index.html
>
> I do not have any problem stepping through the code with gdb.
I solved my problems by switching back to gcc 2.96 and by fixing
a couple of things in the code; now I want to go back to
gcc 3.2 to see if the problem was fixed by my last changes
or by the different compiler (note, though, that I compiled
everything, to my knowlegde, with gcc 3.2 and everything worked
fine until now).
I'll let you know in a while.
By the way, did you fix the libtool portability problem? I'd
like to see your changes before I commit anything.
Ando.
--
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it