[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: SLAPI (ITS#2073)
Ando,
With this patch, we are only offering plugins for PerOperation,
PostOperation and ExtendedOperation. Per Netscape definition, these plugins
must be associated with a particular backend. And that is why I put the
plugin directive in back-ldbm/config.c and back-bdb/config.c rather than
slapd/config.c. If you can put the directive in slapd/config.c and still
meet the Netscape requirement, well that is great.
We should support plugins with all backends. I am just short on time.
Thanks,
Steve Omrani
Senior Software Developer
Internet: somrani@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-838-8375 (TL 678-8375)
Fax: 512-838-8597
"Pierangelo
Masarati" To: Steve Omrani/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
<ando@sys-net.it> cc: <openldap-its@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: SLAPI (ITS#2073)
11/10/2002 11:19
AM
Please respond to
ando
I have another question; I see you explicitly
recompile some slapi stuff into back-ldbm and
back-bdb only to allow "plugin" directive into
backend specific directive blocks; I'd prefer
(and I actually did it, I'll post a new revised
patch ASAP) to move "plugin" directives into
slapd/config.c and to check that it is used
inside the appropriate blocks by adding a
SLAP_BFLAG_SLAPI flag to those backends that
actually support slapi (BTW, is there any reason
not to support slapi inside the other backends?
I understand most of them, including back-shell
and back-ldap/meta could be rewritten in terms
of slapi plugins, but this is another question ...)
Ando.
--
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it