Re: Schema violations not caught (ITS#398)

[dupuis@syntax.com]

 > Okay, here is the scoop with regard to OpenLDAP 1.2.  An undefined
 > objectclass is treated as requiring no attributes and allowing all
 > attributes.  That is, an undefined objectlass behaves much like
 > the LDAPv3 extensibleObject objectclass.
 > 
 > This will likely not be changed in OpenLDAP 1.x to maintained
 > backwards compatibility with U-Mich 3.3.  It's likely something
 > worth discussing in regards to 2.0 development (on the devel
 > list please).

OK, I'll check out the discussion, and see what other people's
thoughts on the matter are. Thanks for your help!

-Chris