[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Solaris 2.6 horrors

To: "Joe Sabu" <Joe.Sabu@dothill.com>
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.6 horrors
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <kurt@boolean.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 09:23:13 -0800
Cc: "Joe Sabu" <Joe.Sabu@dothill.com>, <openldap-bugs@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <00aa01bf3b81$11abe080$9d8774d8@boxhill.com>
References: <008c01bf3b7f$342441e0$9d8774d8@boxhill.com>

At 05:20 PM 11/30/99 -0500, Joe Sabu wrote:
>and, lo, it works!!
>Is it a bug? Was I not defining objectclasses (by not including the
>*.oc.conf etc..)?

If you commented out *.oc.conf files then you didn't provide
any object class definitions to SLAPD.  SLAPD should have
gracefully shutdown if dependent items are not defined.  If it
crashed (ie: seg faulted), that's a bug.  You should file an
ITS (http://www.openldap.org/its/) that describes exactly how
to reproduce the bug and provide a stack backtrace if at all
possible.

>If so, is the QuickStart faq misleading?

I guess so.

----
Kurt D. Zeilenga		<kurt@boolean.net>
Net Boolean Incorporated	<http://www.boolean.net/>

Prev by Date: Re: installation problems (ITS#392)
Next by Date: Re: Shared libraries on Solaris (ITS#376)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread