[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] Unfinished business: password policy and VLV

To: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Unfinished business: password policy and VLV
From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:59:54 -0700
Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
Delivered-to: ldapext@core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4A4EC639.3070706@highlandsun.com>
References: <OFA71CDB2F.9614DC09-ON852573EC.0069861C-852573EC.006BDD73@us.ibm.com> <4A4EC639.3070706@highlandsun.com>

Howard,

I note that the ITU/ISO has been working on a X.500 Password Policymechanism, see <http://www.x500standard.com/index.php?n=Ig.Extension>. I would argue that if the IETF is to do anything inthe area of password policy standardization, it should consider simplyadapting the X.500 mechanism for use in LDAP.

I encourage those who have issue with the ITU/ISO proposal to commenton the X.500 mailing list, see <http://www.x500standard.com/index.php?n=Participate.MailingList>.


-- Kurt
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ldapext] Unfinished business: password policy and VLV
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>

References:
- Re: [ldapext] Unfinished business: password policy and VLV
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ldapext] Unfinished business: password policy and VLV
Next by Date: Re: [ldapext] Unfinished business: password policy and VLV
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread