Even though the short names may be registered, they may map to different attribute IDs on the back end. Not sure if that's a factor here or not.
For example, the co attribute has O.I.D. 1.2.840.113556.1.2.131 in Microsoft's Active Directory and is defined as single-valued. In RFC1274, it is assigned O.I.D. 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.43 and is intended to contain multiple values.
Mike
Isn't that just a bug?
MVH leifj
_______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext