Re: [ldapext] syntax or matching rule flaw in RFC 3045

[John McMeeking <jmcmeek@us.ibm.com>]

We didn't bother to put the root DSE attributes in our schema.  Server
behavior is hard-coded and wouldn't be affected by the proposed change.


John McMeeking

(Document link: John McMeeking)

ldapext-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 09/22/2004 02:54:15 PM:

> We were looking at implementing this and someone noticed that the syntax
> for the attributes is Directory String (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15)
> while the EQUALITY rule is caseExactIA5Match
> (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.109.114.1).
>
> I assume the author was at one point using the IA5 String syntax and
> changed to Directory String but forgot to change the EQUALITY rule (the
> author doesn't work at Novell anymore or I'd ask him). We should
> probably update the RFC. Do other vendors who have implemented this use
> a caseExactMatch (2.5.13.5) for the EQUALITY?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext