[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
- To: <ldapext@ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
- From: Chris Ridd <chris.ridd@isode.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:07:20 +0000
- In-reply-to: <3FA27CDA.1060409@stroeder.com>
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
On 31/10/03 3:16 pm, Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:
> John McMeeking wrote:
>>
>> I feel that numsubordinates should return 0 when hassubordinates would
>> return FALSE. Since hassubordinates can include subentries,
>> numsubordinates should also.
>
> Ok, I agree with that.
>
> Ciao, Michael.
Since one of the draft's authors is our CEO, I should add that our DSA works
this way. The hasSubordinates value is only TRUE when numSubordinates is
non-zero.
Cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext