Re: LDAPSubentries comments review and request for last callby LDAPEXT and LDUP working groups

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

At 08:29 AM 7/19/2001, Ed Reed wrote:
>LDAP includes, by reference, X.500 subentries, including refinement

Then why are we wasting our time with LDAPsubentries?
X.500 subentries provides a sound approach, an approach
proven to work for holding subschema, ACIs, and collective
attributes.  We certainly don't need an second approach,
especially one which is inconsistent with the X.500 data
model which implementations "MUST act in accordance with."

Kurt