[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: expansion of groups/roles/subtree subjects in LDAP ACM
Rob,
I think we need to differentiate between grant and deny acis when evaluation
fails--we should always fail toward denying the access. On failure, a grant
aci should assume the aciSubject does not apply while a deny aci should
assume that it does apply.
--the walrus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert byrne [mailto:robert.byrne@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:25 AM
> To: Kurt D. Zeilenga
> Cc: john.strassner@intelliden.com; Ryan Moats;
> ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> Subject: Re: expansion of groups/roles/subtree subjects in LDAP ACM
>
>
>
> Kurt,
>
> I think what's needed here is for the draft to specify that, if the
> evaluation of any part of the subject fails, then the subject part of
> that aci does not apply. So we can change the intro to 4.3.2.4 to
> something like:
>
> "4.3.2.4 Applicability Rules for Subjects
>
> Call the subject portion of the ACI in question aciSubject. Then to
> determine if aciSubject applies to requestorSubject we apply the
> following rules. In the case where the server fails to evaluate a
> rule and so fails to fully confirm that aciSubject applies, then
> aciSubject does not apply."
>
> Rob.
>
> John Strassner wrote:
> >
> > agreed, except that noting in the log system that the
> group/role/subtree
> > has not been fully expanded **may** give, in some cases,
> more information
> > than needed and be a start in compromising security.
> >
> > regards,
> > John
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Moats [mailto:rmoats@lemurnetworks.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:18 PM
> > To: Kurt D. Zeilenga
> > Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> > Subject: Re: expansion of groups/roles/subtree subjects in LDAP ACM
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:58:23PM -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> > > How are exceptional conditions in expanding
> > > groups/roles/subtrees to be handled? In particular,
> > > what is the ACM behavior when the groups/roles/subtrees
> > > cannot be fully expanded and the requestor's DN is not
> > > found in the partial set of DNs?
> > >
> > > Kurt
> >
> > Well as an initial (not perfect) suggestion I would opt for
> > notifying via the log system that the group/role/subtree
> > has not been fully expanded and that access has been denied
> > because the DN is not in the partial set.
> >
> > Ryan
>