[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Matched values: valuesReturnFilter string representation
Section 5 says:
The string representation of the valuesReturnFilter in the examples
below uses the notation defined in RFC 2254 [11].
However, as a valuesReturnFilter is a sequence of simple
filters, the string representation of valuesReturnFilter is
actually more like:
valuesReturnFilter = "(" 1*simplefilter ")"
simplefilter = "(" item ")"
where item is as defined by RFC2254. I suggest the string
representation should be specified in the I-D.
Using the above BNF, all of the single item valueReturnFilter
presented in the examples need to be wrapped by another set of
parens, e.g: ((attributeTypes=1.2.3.4.5))
One could define a BNF that for sequences of 1 simplefilter
the outer parens were eliminated. However, having the
outer parens distinguishes valueReturnFilters from
filters.
Kurt