[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Matching Rules for Constructed Syntaxes
Hi David and others,
I do not see why we should not include it in our first draft for the LDAP
alignment works. David, hope to see you in Orlando. Your presence would be
very useful.
Erik Andersen
Mobile: +45 20 97 14 90
E-mail; era.als@get2net.dk
Internet: http://www.cenorm.be/isss/Workshop/DIR/Default.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: David Chadwick [SMTP:d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 5:44 PM
To: osidirectory@az05.bull.com
Subject: Re: Matching Rules for Constructed Syntaxes
Folks
I think there is considerable merit in what Steven is suggesting, and
I wonder how we can make it part of our X.500 work - maybe as
part of the LDAP alignment work? Or should it be a separate topic?
David
***************************************************
David Chadwick
IS Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT
Tel +44 161 295 5351 Fax +44 161 745 8169
Mobile +44 790 167 0359
Email D.W.Chadwick@salford.ac.uk
Home Page http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm
Understanding X.500 http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm
X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm
Entrust key validation string MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J
***************************************************