[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Duplicate entries filter
Oh yeah, now I remember. This is an addition that Kurt pointed out should be there. The thinking was that it'd be unexpected to return entries that don't match the search filter. This being the case, there's a bit of functionality crossover between the dupent and matchedval drafts (under the right conditions).
Jim
>>> "David Chadwick" <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk> 8/5/00 5:44:38 PM >>>
Jim
as we discussed at the Pittsburgh meeting, the text still says that
duplicate entries will only be returned that pass the filter. Is this still
the intention or is it a mistake. Text reproduced below:
"These duplicate entries are returned to the client only if they still
match the asserted search filter."
David
***************************************************
David Chadwick
IS Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT
Tel +44 161 295 5351 Fax +44 161 745 8169
Mobile +44 790 167 0359
Email D.W.Chadwick@salford.ac.uk
Home Page http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm
Understanding X.500 http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm
X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm
Entrust key validation string MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J
***************************************************