Re: Use of criticality in dupent-04

["Jim Sermersheim" <JIMSE@novell.com>]

I'm changing the text of the dupent draft to read "The criticality is ignored".

Jim

>>> "David Chadwick" <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk> 7/28/00 12:07:56 PM >>>
Date forwarded: 	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date sent:      	Wed, 26 Jul 2000 01:09:47 -0600
From:           	"Jim Sermersheim" <JIMSE@novell.com>
To:             	<ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>, <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk>
Subject:        	Re: Use of criticality in dupent-04
Forwarded by:   	ietf-ldapext@netscape.com 

> I wouldn't mind removing this, but... 2251 is ambiguous in this area.
> If 2251 were to state that the criticality field is only valid and
> checked in requests, and ignored for responses, I'd feel more
> comfortable. Note also that there are a number of other drafts that
> have the same language (see SSS and VLV).

Yep - they are wrong as well. Seems like you all copied from each 
other

David

***************************************************

David Chadwick
IS Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT
Tel +44 161 295 5351  Fax +44 161 745 8169
Mobile +44 790 167 0359
Email D.W.Chadwick@salford.ac.uk 
Home Page  http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm 
Understanding X.500  http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm 
X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm 
Entrust key validation string MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J

***************************************************