[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
password policy I-D
I notice that the revised I-D, intended for publication on
the Standard Track, still contains a normative reference to
an Informational RFC (2307). This would have be corrected.
I also note that 'Proposed Standard' appears on each page
in the header. This I find this misleading and inappropriate.
I suggest that the first page state:
Intended Category: Standard Track
and/or an appropriate statement in the Status of the Memo
section.
I will defer a more detailed review for another day...
Kurt