[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: OID of caseExactIA5SubstringsMatch

To: "'Kurt D. Zeilenga'" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>, <ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>
Subject: RE: OID of caseExactIA5SubstringsMatch
From: "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:45:58 +1000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.0.20000630175934.00af47c0@infidel.boolean.net>

Kurt,

I'm not aware of a standard definition for caseExactIA5SubstringsMatch
and we don't use a private definition. I believe the latest edition
of X.500 (I haven't got a copy handy to double check) extends/corrects the
definition of caseExactMatch, etc, to apply to string types other than
DirectoryString (including IA5String) so we treat caseExactIA5Match
as an alternative name/OID for caseExactMatch and use
caseExactSubstringsMatch for substring matching of IA5Strings.

Similar applies for caseIgnoreMatch.

Regards,
Steven

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 July 2000 11:09
> To: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> Subject: OID of caseExactIA5SubstringsMatch
> 
> 
> What OID are others using for this rule?
> Does there exist a formal specification for this rule?
> 
> Thanks, Kurt
> 
> 
>

References:
- OID of caseExactIA5SubstringsMatch
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Revised Matched Values Draft
Next by Date: String Encodings - was RE: Applicability Stmt (AS) rescinding "IESG Note" and defining "LDAPv3"
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread