[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete-02.txt

To: 'Bruce Greenblatt' <bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com>
Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete-02.txt
From: "Paul Leach (Exchange)" <paulle@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:09:35 -0800
Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"dB3NYD.A.Qk.UsGN4"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Greenblatt [mailto:bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 9:53 AM

<snip>

> It is really just a matter of style.

Agreed. But since we have _significant_ operational experience with the
proposed style, and since you agree is just a matter of style, why not the
proposed style?

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete-02.txt
  - From: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-mmeredit-rootdse-vendor-info-00.txt
Next by Date: Policy in IETF APIs (was: Standards and APIs)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread