[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: creatorsName/modifiersName referential integrity
> In the depressingly common case where directories are "updated" by
> removing a subtree wholesale and rebuilding it from other data
> sources, starting to enforce referential integrity by instantly
> removing attributes of other entries would be an operational disaster.
>
>
I agree this should not be enforced by the standard. But you can
argue that a server that does internally maintain consistent DN
pointers, and keeps them updated, will be far less of an operational
disaster than one that does not. I know which I would rather buy.
David
> Harald A
>
> --
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway
> Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no
>
>
***************************************************
David Chadwick
IS Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT
Tel +44 161 295 5351 Fax +44 161 745 8169
Mobile +44 790 167 0359
Email D.W.Chadwick@salford.ac.uk
Home Page http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm
Understanding X.500 http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm
X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm
Entrust key validation string MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J
***************************************************