Re: Details on TCP sequence numbers (RE: C API: minor comments)

[mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)]

"Paul Leach (Exchange)" wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:Harald@Alvestrand.no]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 4:56 PM
> 
> >
> > For unauthenticated CLDAP - yes.
> >
> > I still say it does not matter in the present batch of specs.
> 
> I'll agree with that. My expectation was that the LDAP API would be usable
> pretty much as is for CLDAP, too. Maybe some small mods.

Probably true, but CLDAP is out of scope in my view until we see a CLDAP
protocol draft.


> 
> BTW: if the design weren't so far along, I'd have the API _return_ the ID it
> used, instaed of having the caller assign them.

The C LDAP API calls do return a message id that is generated by the
underlying implementation.

-- 
Mark Smith
iPlanet Directory Architect / Sun-Netscape Alliance
My words are my own, not my employer's.   Got LDAP?