[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Authentication Methods for LDAP - last call

I agree with Mark and Tim.  I also would expect something down the road a
year or two that will tighten these authentication requirements further.

Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mark Wahl [SMTP:M.Wahl@INNOSOFT.COM]
> Sent:	Thursday, August 13, 1998 1:50 PM
> To:	Tim Howes
> Cc:	Chris Newman; Paul Leach; IETF LDAP Extensions WG
> Subject:	Re: Authentication Methods for LDAP - last call
> 
> 
> > I'm not. That would delay us (and every other thing
> > the LDAPEXT group is working on) for about a year,
> > would be my guess. It may be that when we have a
> > good replacement for cram-md5 we should incorporate
> > that into the ldap spec. But until such a thing
> > exists, we should use the best that's available to
> > us. That sounds like cram-md5.          -- Tim
> 
> I agree completely.
> 
> Mark Wahl, Directory Product Architect
> Innosoft International, Inc.
>