[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: About aliases an X.500....More on CIP
Well this is a well informed position :-)
The comment says on instant of an interface - I did not say "through the
one and only interface" - I bet a DAP (or LDAP) ient can scan 20 DSAs a
lot faster than a highly manually configured set of 20 LDAP servers
which all do referrals.
But that is because X.500 is complex - but it does give better service
- and we (with our X.500 DSA/LDAP server) can even integrate single
function LDAP servers to work in a distributed manner under a common
access control regime.
LDAP only systems cannot even intergrate their servers.as per X.500 -
thats too complex "quote from an RFC" :-)
ie We have the car doors - and the car - in a market that wants to
travel.
regards alan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dboreham@netscape.com [SMTP:dboreham@netscape.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 1998 9:26 AM
> To: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> Subject: Re: About aliases an X.500....More on CIP
>
> Alan Lloyd wrote:
> 20 DSAs using DSP with subsecond responses to one
> instance of a
> client interface (no referrals) cant be wrong.
> <slapd forehead>
> Now I understand: there's only supposed to be _one_ client
> of the X.500 service, and it can be dead slow.
> And here I am worrying when response time isn't sub-_millisecond_...
>
>