[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: absent matchingRule (was Re: protocol-27 comments #3)
Jim Sermersheim writes:
>>>> Which means just (:dn:=foo) is not allowed. Maybe the draft should
>>>> suggest that one can use (1.1:dn:=foo).
>>
>> Looking at the description of dnAttributes under extensibleMatch in
>> 4.5.1. Search Request, it returns TRUE if a DN attribute matches foo -
>> regardless of Undefined or False from the rest of the filter.
>
> Hmm, to me it looks like the attribute type is unknown, thus the entire
> filter item would be Undefined.
You are right.
--
Hallvard