[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-filter-08.txt
At 06:48 AM 11/2/2004, Mark Smith wrote:
>>>>>1. Introduction
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I would like to see a reference to [Roadmap] on first use of LDAP
>>>>(as [Roadmap] is the (LDAP TS). Maybe a slight rewording would
>>>>facilitate that.
>
>[mcs] Good idea. Perhaps just replaced the [Protocol] reference below with [Roadmap]? Or do we need to keep this sentence too:
>
> This document is an integral part of the LDAP Technical Specification
> [Roadmap].
Citing [Roadmap] on first use of LDAP is appropriate as
[Roadmap] defines what is LDAP. This sentences makes it
clear that this I-D is integral part of LDAP, and was also
intended to be part of the I-D's description of how it
relates to other I-Ds (and obsoleted RFCs). I note that in
many of the LDAPBIS I-Ds (see [Protocol] & [Models]), we're
now using the longer form:
This document is a integral part of the LDAP technical
specification [Roadmap] which obsoletes the previously
defined LDAP technical specification, RFC 3377, in its
entirety.
and immediately following this with the particular obsolete
information for this I-D. I suggest you do likewise here.
(I just noticed that [LDAPDN] should use the long form, will
update that.)