[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: NOT filter question
Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>At 09:49 AM 9/2/2004, John McMeeking wrote:
>>Is this something that should be clarified in the LDAP standards?
>
> IMO, yes. We should make it clear in [Protocol] that AVA evaluation
> is a specified in X.501(1993), providing a summary of these
> semantics.
Do X.500/LDAP servers stay with 1993 semantics when accessed through
LDAP? If not, a warning to client implementors and maybe an example
might be in order. E.g. using (!(&(player=cn=Ron)(player=*))) instead
of (!(player=cn=Ron)), unless I've missed something.
--
Hallvard