|
>>> Hallvard B Furuseth h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 3/15/04 11:12:10 AM >>
>
>[Protocol] 4.9 Modify DN Operation: > >If an entry containing the attribute cn:FOO is renamed to cn=foo, >MAY/SHOULD/SHOULD NOT the server replace cn:FOO with cn:foo in the >entry? The current text (describing the newrdn parameter) does >not permit this. MUST NOT, as the name already exists. Unfortunately this is a common end-user complaint.
I note that Protocol is missing language regarding the scenario where newrdn should be the same as the existing rdn (when moving and not renaming). I'll fix that.
>If an entry is renamed to cn=bar, may the server add the attribute >cn:BAR? Yes, but I doubt there are many that do,
Jim
|