[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Protocol: control specifications.
I wrote:
>>> As important as rejecting cleartext password binds done without TLS.
>>
>> Bad example. Use of cleartext passwords without TLS is not a protocol
>> error.
>
> I didn't mean to imply it was. It is example of what Ron called
> "I didn't do it. I could have but, na-na-na, you got the (***)
> wrong. Let that teach you a lesson!"
> which, as it happens, this example was a reply to.
Before someone complains: I just noticed that I read of 'wrong' as
something like 'bad, therefore unsupported here' while Ron probably
meant 'error'. Except for that, the point is the same.
--
Hallvard