|
Hallvard,
I'm guessing that you mis-read my statement because I can't see how the semantics statement affect the problem I mention.
Jim
>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 3/8/04 11:51:13 AM >>> Jim Sermersheim writes: > - If there are cases where clients have a need to set the criticality > to false, and also be notified whether the control was applied, then > the control specification ought to provide some return control for > purposes of acknowledgment. ...if the control was applied. True, but that's another issue. I think it's covered by this text in the draft: (note: the semantics of the criticality field are defined above should not be altered by the control's specification) -- Hallvard |