[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Protocol: control specifications.

To: Jim Sermersheim <jimse@novell.com>
Subject: RE: Protocol: control specifications.
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:51:13 +0100
Cc: Ron.Ramsay@ca.com, jmcmeek@us.ibm.com, ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <s04375bd.054@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
References: <s04375bd.054@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>

Jim Sermersheim writes:
> - If there are cases where clients have a need to set the criticality
> to false, and also be notified whether the control was applied, then
> the control specification ought to provide some return control for
> purposes of acknowledgment.

...if the control was applied.  True, but that's another issue.
I think it's covered by this text in the draft:

     (note: the semantics of the criticality field 
     are defined above should not be altered by the control's 
     specification)

-- 
Hallvard

Prev by Date: Re: SASL mechanisms that return no data in last leg
Next by Date: RE: Protocol: control specifications.
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread