|
Hallvard,
>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 2/27/04 1:45:49 AM >>>
>The current draft is even worse than your proposal, though: >
> - Regardless of the value of the criticality field, if the server
> recognizes the control type and it is appropriate for the > operation, the server is to make use of the control when > performing the operation. >
>Now it _really_ isn't possible to treat wrong criticality as an error.
I think that's the point (we are trying to remove ambiguity). This language is simple to understand and implement. Any recommendations given in control specifications are to the client implementer.
>With this wording it doesn't make sense here to claim that "when
>performing the operation" only applies if the operation is performed at >all, and that one can still return an error instead. I agree. Hopefully no one will twist the language in that way.
Jim
|