[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-05.txt

To: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-05.txt
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:16:09 +0100
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <1395B4B334FCC143B36AF788E68B6381010D12CE@ausyms21.ca.com>
References: <1395B4B334FCC143B36AF788E68B6381010D12CE@ausyms21.ca.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Ramsay, Ron wrote:

And it can be marked critical using '!'?


Yes, why not?

It's up to the LDAP application whether it is able to apply any reasonable semantics to !bindname=<Bind-DN>.

Personally I'd prefer draft-ietf-ldapbis-url not as being strictly tied or limited to draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-05.txt
  - From: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-authmeth-10.txt
Next by Date: dITStructureRules
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread