[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: SUBCLASSING, again

At 06:56 PM 2/11/2004, Kathleen Dally wrote:
>I would have no trouble deleting the sentence from Models, section
>2.4.3:
>        " Auxiliary object classes cannot subclass structural object
>classes."

Even though the model makes no sense in face of such
constructions?

>However, I do not believe that the intent to permit Auxiliary object
>classes to subclass Structural object classes is as clear in X.501.

Why?  Since X.501 didn't explicitly disallow this, why do
you think it clear that the intent was to disallow this?

Kurt