[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [schema] vs. rfc2247 replacement
At 06:08 AM 12/12/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Will [schema]'s claim to define 'dc' pass IANA at all, since the
>attribute name is currently owned by someone else's RFCs? And will the
>publication [schema] be held up while IANA resolves the ownership of the
>name?
The IANA considerations section requests the registry be updated.
>Maybe also the 'uid' attribute name, though I didn't find any definiton
>of that. The definition in rfc1274 is of 'userid'. The other RFCs I
>checked just refer to that RFC even though they use the 'uid' name.
uid/userid case is a bit messy. We need to make it
clear that [Schema] provides the definitive technical
specification for this attribute type. As I read it
now, I'm thinking the text may needs some tweaking.
Kurt