If this is seen as a impediment to progressing the protocol document, we could add a mechanism there. Otherwise, we can invent the mechanism (likely in the form of a control) in another document.
Jim >>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 11/9/03 10:13:44 AM >>> rfc2277 (IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages) says: > 4.2. Requirement for language tagging > > Protocols that transfer text MUST provide for carrying information > about the language of that text. This implies that LDAP needs something like an Accept-Language extended operation similar to the HTTP Accept-Language: header. It would specify which languages the client prefers for LDAPResult.diagnosticMessage and text in unsolicited notifications. -- Hallvard |