[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
filter-05 comments
In section 5 (LDAP Search Filter Definition), the Filter and
SubstringFilter definitions do not match those in [Protocol].
In section 6 (String Search Filter Definition), "section 1.3
(Common ABNF Productions) of [Models]" should be section 1.4.
Section 7 (Examples):
This paragraph seems to have been garbled:
> The third example illustrates the use of the ":dn" notation to
> indicate that matching rule "2.4.6.8.10" should be used when making
> comparisons,
No, the ":2.4.6.8.10" notation indicates that.
> and that the attributes of an entry's distinguished name
> should be considered part of the entry when evaluating the match.
Finally,
> The sixth and final example demonstrates assertion of a BER encoded
> value.
How? It's no different from the fourth example, except for the
numericoid. Does a numericoid in a string filter indicate BER?
If so, the document should say so.
--
Hallvard