[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: REVISED protocol review notes [LONG]

To: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@novell.com>
Subject: Re: REVISED protocol review notes [LONG]
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 21:37:49 -0800
Cc: <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <sf9c4783.045@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
References: <sf9c4783.045@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>

At 09:15 PM 10/26/2003, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>>>> Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> 10/7/03 3:48:43 PM >>>
>>Insert here <end of 4.4.1> a statement as to what a specification of a Notice
>>of Disconnect consists of.
>Are you saying that we should mention that other specifications may also define different "Notice of Disconnect" operations, and then provide guidelines for those specifications? I'm not sure what the benefit is.

Sorry, I intended to suggest that guidelines for "Unsolicited
Notifications" (in general) should be added (in 4.4).  The
guidelines should be similar to those for Extended Operations
and Controls.

Kurt

References:
- Re: REVISED protocol review notes [LONG]
  - From: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@novell.com>

Prev by Date: Re: REVISED protocol review notes [LONG]
Next by Date: RE: New text for X.501
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread