Ok, I finally read Steven's comments with a fixed pitch font so I could see what he was *actually* pointing out. He was asking if the "will" shoul dbe a MUST, which your re-wording does seem to cover.
Sorry for the noise. >>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> 10/20/03 11:39:34 PM >>> At 10:13 PM 10/20/2003, Jim Sermersheim wrote: >>>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" < Kurt@OpenLDAP.org > 10/8/03 7:59:20 AM >>> ><snip> > >>> 4.13.3.1. Graceful Closure >>> The other party, if it receives a TLS closure alert, MUST immediately >>> transmit a TLS closure alert. It will subsequently cease to send TLS >>> ^^^^ MUST ? >> >>Please consider the replace text I offer in my comments. >Kurt, I didn't see any replacement text in your comments for this section. Sorry, how about? The other party, upon receipt of a TLS closure alert, SHALL immediately send a TLS closure alert and then terminate the TLS connection. The LDAP connection remains established unless subsequently terminated. |