[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: authmeth-07 issues
I wrote:
> State the effect of a failed SASL bind or a non-SASL bind on an existing
> SASL security layer. I expect it would be something like this:
>
> A bindRequest (successful or not) which is not successfully abandoned,
> cancels [is that the right word?] any previously established SASL
> security layer, so that the bindResponse is sent without that layer.
>
> [Or - if there are outstanding, possibly-abandoned requests, will the
> client know when the security layer gets cancelled? Does the layer
> itself necessarily contain a "cancel" operation so the client can tell?]
Sorry, I was thinking of ease of SASL implementations when I wrote this.
A way which would be predictable is for the layer to be cancelled after
the server response. I don't know _which_ server response though...
I'll take this to the SASL list (ietf-sasl@imc.org).
--
Hallvard