[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: IETF ldapbis WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-05.txt

To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: IETF ldapbis WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-05.txt
From: Norbert Klasen <norbert+lists.ietf-ldapbis@burgundy.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 20:39:37 +0200
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030505170904.02aa92c0@127.0.0.1>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030505170904.02aa92c0@127.0.0.1>

Hi, the schema in many LDAP servers contains an alternate name for those attributes, whose name is an abbreviation from the name of the respective X.500 attribute type, e.g. 'cn' and 'commonName' or 'st' and 'stateOrProvinceName'. Should this be reflected in the user-schema document?

Norbert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IETF ldapbis WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-05.txt
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: IETF ldapbis WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-05.txt
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- IETF ldapbis WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-05.txt
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: userPassword comment
Next by Date: Re: IETF ldapbis WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-05.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread