[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Simple+TLS as mandatory-to-implement (RE: Issues with current authmeth draft.)

To: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>
Subject: RE: Simple+TLS as mandatory-to-implement (RE: Issues with current authmeth draft.)
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:41:47 -0700
Cc: <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <1395B4B334FCC143B36AF788E68B638110620E@ausyms21.ca.com>

At 09:38 PM 5/12/2003, Ramsay, Ron wrote:
>I note that LDAPbis cannot change the LDAP specification,

We certainly can change, within certain limits, the LDAP
technical specification.  See our charter.

>but do you see it as possible to change the mandatory-to-implement authentication method?

Yes.  Changing an elective feature to be mandatory-to-implement
is quite possible.  However, such changes should not be made lightly.

Kurt

References:
- RE: Simple+TLS as mandatory-to-implement (RE: Issues with current authmeth draft.)
  - From: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Simple+TLS as mandatory-to-implement (RE: Issues with current authmeth draft.)
Next by Date: Re: Simple+TLS as mandatory-to-implement (RE: Issues with current authmeth draft.)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread