Re: subschema semantics (Was: Models: Schema references to undefined entities)

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
> How about dropping the 4.2 addition suggestion (I
> made in the summary (item 11) and instead add the
> following to 4.4?
> 
>         Clients SHOULD NOT assume a published subschema is
>         complete nor assume the server supports all schema
>        elements it publishes.

Fine.
(I'd prefer 'publishes or references', but that's no big deal.)

-- 
Hallvard