[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Models: DIT Content Rules and AUX object classes
- To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Subject: Re: Models: DIT Content Rules and AUX object classes
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:02:20 +0100
- Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
- In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030131102420.01a0e050@127.0.0.1>
- References: <HBF.20030131mgbt@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030131102420.01a0e050@127.0.0.1>
Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>> If so, I suggest it is added that e.g. "AUX 1.1" can be used to say
>> 'no auxiliary objectclasses are allowed'.
>
> That would be an extension to the existing schema model
> and hence beyond scope of this document.
Well, I only wanted that if 'no AUX' meant 'all aux classes allowed'.
--
Hallvard